Anti-entrapment invention hits US market

Monday, 12 August, 2013

Three Safety Vacuum Release System (SVRS) pioneers have joined forces to introduce a new product they believe could change the landscape of anti-entrapment equipment.

In the 1990s, the phenomenon of suction entrapment was becoming more commonly known. David Stingl and Paul McKain sought to address these incidents by inventing the first two safety vacuum release systems, meant to remove the vacuum that can form in pool plumbing and cause entrapment. In 1996, Stingl founded Stingl Products with Tony Sirianni. Paul McKain’s PlaySafe hit the market about a year later.

The three have teamed up to offer the Pool and Spa Drain ProteKtor, a small device meant to prevent three of the five types of entrapment. It plugs directly into the drain pipe inside the sump, thus preventing access to the opening and, developers believe, answering widespread concerns about the hazards of a drain if the cover should come off.

The device incorporates technology from Ron Schroader, developer of Drainsafe outlet covers, one of the few brands to escape a massive Consumer Product Safety Commission drain cover recall in 2011.

The makers said the ProteKtor will prevent limb, hair and mechanical entrapment and mitigate evisceration in single- and dual-drain pools. It doesn’t help with body entrapment, McKain added, but they expect to work on another version that will.

McKain and Sirianni said they’re not seeking to replace SVRSs but to augment them, in part because the older technology is known to protect against body entrapment.

Sirianni said that with a retail price between US$59 and US$69, the product could represent an alternative for residential pools, most of which are not required by code to have the pricier SVRSs or other backups. “[SVRSs] are still a vital and important part of single main drains,” Sirianni said. “But the part of SVRSs we have not been able to overcome is that we have not crossed over into the residential pool market. And the residential pool market has more entrapments than we do in the commercial pool market.”

The openings are small enough to prevent hair or mechanical entrapment, the sellers claim. The top plane is covered with the largest holes permitted by code to prevent entrapment while allowing as much flow as possible. The sides are covered with a fine mesh, the use of which was licensed from Schroader.

PSD Industries is placing the product on the market and seeking distributors.

The company plans to approach the Consumer Product Safety Commission to have the product listed as one of its approved anti-entrapment methods to conform with the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act, but not necessarily to have it placed in state and local codes. “It’s not my goal to try to push this into code,” McKain said. “I just want to make sure this always remains a choice.”

Story first reported in Pool and Spa News USA -

Related News

Singapore installs drowning detection technology in public pools

After extensive testing, national agency Sport Singapore will install computer vision drowning...

Are compulsory gate alarms the answer?

The recent drowning death of a toddler in Western Australia has led the boy's mother to speak...

Commercial fibreglass filters drive growth for Waterco

Waterco has expanded both its product line and manufacturing capability in response to sustained...

  • All content Copyright © 2020 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd